• Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment
Colbert LawColbert Law
Colbert LawColbert Law
  • Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment

Court gives Wiggle Room for Condo Declaration and Bylaw Amendments Done Incorrectly

Home BoardsCourt gives Wiggle Room for Condo Declaration and Bylaw Amendments Done Incorrectly
Court gives Wiggle Room for Condo Declaration and Bylaw Amendments Done Incorrectly

Court gives Wiggle Room for Condo Declaration and Bylaw Amendments Done Incorrectly

Posted by Team Colbert Law Boards, Business, Condo Coop HOA, Litigation

Amending condominium declaration and bylaws can be difficult; particularly if boards are not guided properly.  The original bylaws when the condo was conceived by the sponsor may be outdated, incorrect or need to be changed for a myriad of other reasons.  If the board doesn’t do it correctly, the condo could get caught up in a litigation like the Towers on the Park Condominium in Manhattan.  A pro se unit owner sued years ago and the appellate court in New York just put an end to the amendment challenge.  In doing so, the Court absolved the condo from a few errors that it made in the amendment process.  The better course however is to get it right the first time so that expensive litigation and acrimony in the condo because of challenges like this do not occur in the first place.

The first step is to determine what the board wants to change in the declaration and bylaws and whether it can obtain the required number of unit owners to vote for the amendment.  Usually, such amendments require a super majority that can be difficult to obtain. There are way, however, to obtain the necessary vote, but it has to be done correctly or suffer a challenge.  

In the Towers on the Park Condominium case the Court mentioned the process used in the vote where the board left the meeting open because it did not obtain the necessary 80% at the first meeting.  This is a typical tactic employed by condo boards but it has to be done correctly at the meeting.  If not, it could be fatal to a vote, but at least this Court saw the defect as technical and absolved the board. It helped though that the challenger overlooked and did not dispute this error in her litigation papers. This is an example of getting is right the first time and avoiding the chance that another court may not be so forgiving.  Imagine if the Court threw out the amendments years later after the condo was governing under the amendments, possibly invalidating board actions under the improper amendments.

The other step that the Towers on the Park Condominium didn’t take correctly was recording the declaration and bylaw amendments with the City Register.  Amendments to declarations and bylaws have to be recorded against each unit in the condominium after the amendments is properly approved by owners.  This is another important step.  The Towers on the Park Condominium board did not record the amendment right away but did do so before the lawsuit to challenge the amendment was filed with the Court.  As so, the Court forgave the condo board again.  The law in NY is that such amendments are not effective until recorded with the City Register against each unit. Thus, the recording should be planned in advance and done right after the necessary vote is obtained.  

Realizing that amendments are difficult, it is important to get the language of the amendment correct.  Once that is nailed down, as long as proper procedure is taken, the road should be smooth for a board.  With Towers on the Park Condominium, the road was not so smooth tying it up in litigation for years.  But, now that the clouds have passed, the changed declaration and bylaws should serve the condo well for years to come.

Read the Reynolds v. Towers on the Park Condominium decision.

Share

About Team Colbert Law

With offices in New York and Connecticut, we are ready to handle your legal needs. We have been representing condo, coop and HOA boards, businesses and individual clients for over twenty five years.

You also might be interested in

New Legislation would change standard for Coop and Condo Evictions

New Legislation would change standard for Coop and Condo Evictions

Mar 5, 2021

More tenants’ rights legislation. If passed condo and coop owners[...]

Holding Condominium Developers and Their Principals Liable

Holding Condominium Developers and Their Principals Liable

Apr 11, 2024

In Board of Managers of the Brighton Tower II Condominium[...]

What’s a Coop, Condo or HOA Board to do when it can’t get its Records from Outgoing Management?

What’s a Coop, Condo or HOA Board to do when it can’t get its Records from Outgoing Management?

Apr 6, 2020

When coop, condo or HOA boards rely on management to[...]

Recent Attorney Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026
  • Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners July 2, 2026

Contact Us

Send us a note and we'll get back to you promptly.

OFFICES

  • Manhattan Office
  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Westchester Office
  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Connecticut Office
  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

Latest Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026

© 2026 Colbert Law LLC Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Highend Logo

Manhattan Office

  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Westchester Office

  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Connecticut Office

  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

OUR EXPERTISE

When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs

July 25, 2026

A recent NYC Civil Court decision (Fortes v. Decorating and...

When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers

July 22, 2026

For condominium boards foreclosing on unpaid common charges,...

When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo

July 21, 2026

Community association boards—whether governing condos,...

Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line

July 13, 2026

When a condominium unit owner defaults on their monthly...

Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners

July 2, 2026

Condominium boards and property managers face a unique,...

When the Neighbor Builds: What Condo and Co-Op Boards Need to Know

June 29, 2026

Construction in New York City is a fact of life, but when a...

Succession Rights in Limited-Equity Co-ops: Practical Lessons from Mutual Redevelopment Houses v. Manyevitch

June 12, 2026

Succession disputes are among the most sensitive and...

The Post-Settlement Trap: What Fiondella Teaches Co-op Boards About Stipulations and Continuing Habitability Claims

June 9, 2026

For New York cooperative boards and managing agents,...

The Derivative Action Threat: Why “Limited Common Elements” Present Litigation Risks for Condominium Boards and Managers

May 16, 2026

A recent decision by the Appellate Division, First...

Governance and Rule-Making in the Modern Condominium

April 27, 2026

Reflections on 10MSW17D LLC v. Bd. of Managers of 10...

Don’t Delay: Why Timely Enforcement of Common Charges is Critical for Condo Boards

April 15, 2026

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of New York,...

RPAPL § 881 Licenses, and Why Fee Reimbursement Is a Core Deal Term

April 13, 2026

Boards and managers of condominiums, cooperatives, and...

The 432 Park Decision: A Masterclass in Risk Management for New York Condo Boards

April 2, 2026

New York condominium boards and management companies operate...

Protecting Your Building’s Integrity: Lessons from Board of Mgrs. of the 80th at Madison Condominium v. 1055 Madison Ave. Owners LLC

March 31, 2026

As a condominium board member or property manager, your...

Press Enter to search · Esc to close